Brass: Birmingham vs The Quacks of Quedlinburg

Side by side comparison of two top board games

Brass: Birmingham

Brass: Birmingham

⭐ 8.6# 3💰 $65👤 2-4

Brass: Birmingham is an economic strategy game sequel to Martin Wallace's Brass. It tells the story of competing entrepreneurs in Birmingham during the industrial revolution. Players must build networks of canals and railways, develop industries, and trade goods. The game features a unique economic system where players can use each other's networks and resources.

EconomicIndustry / ManufacturingTransportation
The Quacks of Quedlinburg

The Quacks of Quedlinburg

⭐ 7.7# 67💰 $35👤 2-4

The Quacks of Quedlinburg is a push-your-luck game where players brew potions by drawing ingredients from their bags. Each ingredient has different effects, and players must decide when to stop drawing before their potion explodes. The game features variable player powers and a unique bag-building mechanism.

FantasyMedievalPuzzle

Specification Comparison

SpecBrass: BirminghamThe Quacks of Quedlinburg
BGG Rank3 ✓67
Rating8.6 ✓7.7
Year Published20182018
Price6535 ✓
Min Players22
Max Players44
Play Time (min)12045 ✓
Min Age1410 ✓
Complexity (1-5)3.85 ✓1.96

Brass: Birmingham wins in 3 categories, The Quacks of Quedlinburg wins in 3 categories.

Brass: Birmingham — Time Estimates

2-Player Game60 min
Quick session with a smaller group
4-Player Game120 min
Full table experience
Learning Session120 min
First time playing (includes setup & rule explanation)

The Quacks of Quedlinburg — Time Estimates

2-Player Game45 min
Quick session with a smaller group
4-Player Game45 min
Full table experience
Learning Session75 min
First time playing (includes setup & rule explanation)

Category & Mechanic Comparison

Brass: Birmingham

Categories
EconomicIndustry / ManufacturingTransportation
Mechanics
Hand ManagementHexagon GridIncomeLoanMarketNetwork and Route BuildingTile PlacementVariable Phase Order

The Quacks of Quedlinburg

Categories
FantasyMedievalPuzzle
Mechanics
Deck, Bag, and Pool BuildingDice RollingOpen DraftingPush Your LuckVariable Player Powers

Rating Comparison

Brass: Birmingham8.6
The Quacks of Quedlinburg7.7

Frequently Asked Questions

Which game has a higher rating, Brass: Birmingham or The Quacks of Quedlinburg?
Brass: Birmingham has a rating of 8.6, while The Quacks of Quedlinburg has 7.7. Brass: Birmingham is rated higher.
Which game is more affordable, Brass: Birmingham or The Quacks of Quedlinburg?
Brass: Birmingham costs approximately $65 and The Quacks of Quedlinburg costs approximately $35. The Quacks of Quedlinburg is the more affordable option.
Which game supports more players, Brass: Birmingham or The Quacks of Quedlinburg?
Brass: Birmingham supports 2-4 players and The Quacks of Quedlinburg supports 2-4 players. The Quacks of Quedlinburg supports more players.
Is Brass: Birmingham or The Quacks of Quedlinburg more complex?
On a scale of 1-5, Brass: Birmingham has a complexity weight of 3.85 and The Quacks of Quedlinburg has 1.96. Brass: Birmingham is the more complex game.
Which game has a shorter play time, Brass: Birmingham or The Quacks of Quedlinburg?
Brass: Birmingham takes about 120 minutes to play, while The Quacks of Quedlinburg takes about 45 minutes. The Quacks of Quedlinburg is the quicker game.

Related Comparisons

Brass: Birmingham vs GloomhavenThe Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Gloomhaven
Brass: Birmingham vs Pandemic Legacy: Season 1The Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Pandemic Legacy: Season 1
Brass: Birmingham vs Terraforming MarsThe Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Terraforming Mars
Brass: Birmingham vs Through the Ages: A New Story of CivilizationThe Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Through the Ages: A New Story of Civilization
Brass: Birmingham vs Star Wars: RebellionThe Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Star Wars: Rebellion
Brass: Birmingham vs ScytheThe Quacks of Quedlinburg vs Scythe